Note: The following is taken from the University of Toronto Libraries's article "What counts as a scholarly source?" with a few edits to make it more relevant to SVC students, staff, and faculty.
Scholarly sources are written by academics and other experts and contribute to knowledge in a particular field by sharing new research findings, theories, analyses, insights, news, or summaries of current knowledge.
Scholarly sources can be either primary or secondary sources. A primary source is an original work of literature, art, or a first-hand account of an event that has not been interpreted by anyone other than its creator. A secondary source is any information written ABOUT the primary source.Scholarly sources can also come in many different formats. Books, articles, and websites can all be scholarly.
Remember, there is sometimes a difference between scholarly and peer-reviewed articles; all peer-reviewed sources are scholarly, but not all scholarly sources are peer-reviewed.
A primary difference between scholarly journals and other types of journals and magazines is that articles in these journals undergo a "peer review" process before they are published.
The process for an article to become "peer-reviewed" is:
Because a peer-reviewed journal will not publish articles that fail to meet the standards established for a given discipline, peer-reviewed articles that are accepted for publication exemplify the best research practices in a field.
Licensed under Creative Commons Attribution from libncsu
When you are determining whether or not the article you found is a peer-reviewed article, you should consider the following.
Does the article have the following features?

You may also wish to view the Anatomy of a Scholarly Article.
Many of the SVC databases provide an option to select "peer reviewed" sources.
To find them:
| All Content CC-BY. |