Skip to Main Content

Evaluating Websites & Internet Sources

Use this guide to help evaluate internet sources

What is this page for?

This page provides some criteria and questions to ask when evaluating a source for credibility.

Criteria for Evaluating Information

Consider these criteria when examining a web source for credibility:


AUTHORITY

  • What are the author’s qualifications/credentials for presenting information on this subject? 

  • Is the author's expertise well established or easy to find?

  • How reputable is the publisher or sponsoring organization? 

    • How? Check the authorship and qualifications, try a quick Google or Wikipedia search for the name or organization. 

OBJECTIVITY OR PERSPECTIVE

  • Is there bias? Is there a clear point of view?

  • Is there a detectable use of specific kinds of tone or language?

    • How? Check to see if the goals or aims of the individual or group are clearly stated or transparent.

CURRENCY

  • Is the content up-to-date? Is the coverage outdated? The importance of dates can change depending on topic and need.

    • How? Check to see if publication dates are included or if information hasn't been consistently updated. 

AUDIENCE

  • Can you identify what audience the material is intended for? Is it directed to students in elementary school? High school?  Is it for adults? Is it aimed at other experts in the field, or professionals?

  • Is the material very complex or simple?

  • Is the language or data used detailed and specific, targeted to other experts? Is it understandable or simplified?

    • How? Check for language usage and tone.

STABILITY OF INFORMATION

  • It’s here today but will it be available tomorrow? 
  • Can you cite it with some assurance that it will be found again?

    • How? Look for permanent links to the resources you find, often located under the "share" option.

PRIVILEGE / ACCESS

  • Are there limitations or gatekeeping as to who has access to the research, or who is able to publish the work?
    • How? Check to see if you need special permission, login credentials, or if you have to pay to access the full information? (Never pay, ask a librarian for help first). Pay attention to who does not have access or voices not represented.

CONTEXT

  • Has the information been removed from and orginal source? It's harder to tell if the information is reliable if it has been taken out of it's original context.
    • How? Check for references and the embedded links to find the orginal research or context.

CRAP Checklist for Evaluating Sources

  • You can use this list as a quick checklist for evaluating your sources, whether they are websites or from SVC resources.
  • You don't need to be able to answer all the questions but use the list as a general evaluating tool.
CURRENCY
  • How recent is the information, does it matter to your topic?
  • Has the resource been consistently updated/revised?
  • Are links current and working?
RELEVANCE
  • Is the information really relevant to your topic?
  • Does the creator provide references or sources for data or ideas?
  • Are there errors?
AUTHORITY
  • Who is the creator, author or sponsor?
  • What credentials does the author or organization have?
  • Does their experience or education indicate that they could be considered "experts"?
  • Is information about the creator easily found?
  • Is information provided about funding sources or data gathering for the work?
PURPOSE / POINT OF VIEW
  • What is the the purpose of the site? Is it obvious what it's for?
  • Are they trying to sell you something or promote an idea?
  • Who is the intended audience?
  • Is there a strong bias, an aggressive use of language, or a balanced tone?
  • Are there lots of pop-ups and irrelevant ads?

 

Check a Source

Additional help with evaluation

All Content CC-BY.
  • instagram logo
  • Facebook logo
  • youtube logo